NEW DELHI: After rebutting allegations of sexual harassment levelled by several females journalists, junior international minister M J Akbar followed it up by filing a prison defamation grievance on Monday against journalist Priya Ramani for “deliberately and maliciously harming his goodwill and recognition on fully false, frivolous, unjustifiable and spoiled grounds”.
In the grievance, filed in a Patiala Dwelling court docket, Akbar, a significant used editor, has blamed Ramani, a used colleague, for an allegedly defamatory article in Vogue magazine in 2017 moreover to her tweets earlier this month that triggered a spate of allegations from assorted females journalists against him.
He has sought Ramani’s prosecution for prison defamation below Piece 499 (defamation), punishable below Piece 500 (easy imprisonment for a time interval which can perhaps well perhaps merely prolong to two years, or ravishing, or both).
The grievance, filed by map of Karanjawala and Co and signed by ninety seven legal professionals, alive to on Ramani’s statements the assign, whereas describing Akbar because the “greatest sexual predator”, she stated he “did now not ‘create’ anything” to her. The minister stated this showed she had acted with the “sole ulterior motive of maligning the recognition and political standing of the complainant, in furtherance of her possess vested interests and underlying agenda”.
“That the accused herself, whereas asserting the aforementioned defamatory statements regarding to incidents which allegedly occurred twenty years ago, concurrently admits that the grievance has now not done anything to her. It is far pertinent to mention that the behavior of the accused person, of now not taking any motion sooner than any authority, when it comes to the alleged incident against the complainant furthermore clearly belies the sanctity of the article and allegations made by the accused person, which evidently goes on to remark their own praises that the stated defamatory articles are perfect a figment of her creativeness and are perfect supposed to malign the recognition of the complainant,” Akbar’s grievance stated.
Ramani responded that she was “deeply disappointed” and keen to fight it out. “I’m deeply disappointed that a Union minister should always clean brush off the detailed allegations of several females as a political conspiracy. By instituting a case of prison defamation against me, Mr Akbar has made his stand definite: rather then capture with the severe allegations that many females dangle made against him, he seeks to silence them by map of intimidation and harassment,” she stated.
“Unnecessary to teach, I’m ready to fight allegations of defamation laid against me, as fact and the absolute fact is my perfect defence,” she added.
Akbar’s grievance furthermore stated, “While it is obvious that the accused has resorted to a sequence of maliciously fabricated allegations, which she is diabolically and viciously spreading the expend of media, it is furthermore obvious that the false fable against the complainant is being circulated in a motivated manner for fulfilment of an agenda.”
Itemizing his accomplishments as an editor moreover to an author, Akbar stated e-newsletter of Ramani’s allegations had triggered “big humiliation to him” and severely tarnished his recognition within the eyes of the general public moreover to his family, mates, colleagues, political fraternity and co-workers.